Apple’s new prime tier Mac Studio, powered by the M3 Extremely chip, accommodates a lot computing horsepower that it’s by no means going to be on the radar of most tech fans — not to mention your common shopper. It begins at $3,999, however if you happen to improve each spec to the perfect on supply (together with an astonishing 512GB of unified reminiscence), you land at a mind-boggling $14,099.
As the value makes clear, the Mac Studio is just not a pc for the everyman. It’s a workstation for many who have already got an thought of simply the way it’ll make their lives simpler and extra productive. If that’s you, the funding may pay for itself in comparatively brief order with quicker exports and extra accomplished initiatives. Time is cash, in spite of everything. And this factor does scream. As only one instance, it’s the primary Mac to interrupt the one minute barrier on our long-running 4K export take a look at in Premiere Professional.
Even so, I’d steer the overwhelming majority of individuals purchasing for a desktop Mac to the M4 Mac Mini, and if you happen to want some further wallop, the M4 Professional model of that machine has by no means damaged a sweat throughout my pictures workflows. Videographers and people doing resource-intensive 3D work could possibly be higher served with the M4 Max version of the brand new Studio; take a look at our MacBook Pro review for a way of that chip’s blistering efficiency. It additionally comes at a much more standard $1,999 entry value.
However even when I’m not the goal marketplace for the “Extremely” Studio, I nonetheless actually needed to get my arms on one after Apple launched it final week alongside a new MacBook Air and faster iPad Air. Who wouldn’t need to kick the tires on a pc like this? Apple despatched me a Mac Studio that, as configured, sells for $8,099. It’s the higher-spec M3 Extremely with a 32-core CPU and 80-core GPU; you get a 32-core neural engine regardless. It’s additionally geared up with 4TB of storage and 256GB of unified reminiscence — half the utmost quantity I discussed earlier.
These are spectacular specs, but it surely’s vital to notice that there are goal advantages to selecting the M4 Max Mac Studio mannequin. It outpaces the M3 Extremely in single-core efficiency, which is probably the most crucial component in making most on a regular basis apps really feel “quick.” The day-to-day consumer expertise is tremendous responsive in each instances, which has been true of all latest Apple Silicon merchandise. You don’t should spend anyplace near this a lot cash for a reliable, speedy Mac.
Other than substantial multi-core positive factors, stepping as much as the Extremely tier nets you some I/O benefits as effectively. The 2 frontside ports supply Thunderbolt 5 connectivity and, theoretically, information switch speeds of as much as 120Gb/s on the M3 Extremely Studio. When you go for the Max, you simply get a pair of standard 10Gb/s USB 3 ports up entrance. The rear of the Studio contains 4 Thunderbolt 5 ports regardless of which chip you select, so it’s primarily a query of whether or not you require peak efficiency out of each obtainable port. In case your work requires an abundance of exterior shows, it’s additionally price realizing that the Extremely Studio helps as much as eight shows, whereas the M4 Max mannequin tops out at 5.
Round again you’ll additionally discover two USB-A ports, an HDMI port, 10-gigabit ethernet, and a 3.5mm audio jack. On the Mac Mini, the three.5mm jack is up entrance, which is extra handy for headphones, however much less so if you happen to’re plugging in full-time audio system that aren’t going anyplace. Just like the MacBook Professional, the Studio contains a UHS-II SDXC card reader, which is one thing I continually miss on the Mini. If cash had been no object, would I improve for an SD card slot? It’s not out of the query.
There stays a noticeable weight distinction between the M4 Max (6.1 kilos) and M3 Extremely Studio (8 kilos); the latter tacks on practically two further kilos because it has a bigger cooling module inside, which is constituted of copper in comparison with the Max’s aluminum heatsink.
System |
Mac Studio M3 Extremely / 32C / 80C / 256GB / 4TB |
MacBook Professional 16-inch M4 Max / 16C / 40C / 128GB / 4TB |
Mac Studio M2 Extremely / 24C / 76C / 128GB / 4TB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench 2024 Single | 150 | 182 | Not examined |
| Cinebench 2024 Multi | 3057 | 2043 | Not examined |
| Cinebench 2024 Multi 30-min loop | 3037 | 2061 | Not examined |
| Cinebench 2024 GPU | 20117 | 16409 | Not examined |
| Geekbench 6 CPU Single | 3246 | 4011 | 2623 |
| Geekbench 6 CPU Multi | 28376 | 26422 | 21397 |
| Geekbench 6 GPU (OpenCL) | 144437 | 115870 | 129482 |
| Geekbench 6 GPU (Metallic) | 254429 | 192753 | 224158 |
| PugetBench for Premiere Professional | 10351 | 12400 | 975 |
| PugetBench for Photoshop | 11593 | 13424 | Not examined |
| Premiere Professional 4K export | 50 seconds | 1 minute, 18 seconds | 1 minute |
Like its predecessors, the 2025 Mac Studio delivers breakneck efficiency whereas operating “shockingly quiet,” as my former colleague Monica Chin wrote two years ago. That continues to be simply as true at the moment because it was then. In a couple of days of testing, this factor has laughed at my Lightroom edits, made fast work of Adobe’s AI noise discount and different results, and I’ve by no means a lot as heard any fan noise.
The M3 Extremely chip is overkill for a lot of. When you want this stage of energy, you already know precisely the way you’ll get probably the most from it. It’s for visible results artists and animators. It’s for professionals doing formidable audio and video manufacturing work. Are you recurrently crunching massive medical datasets? Possibly you need to use all these cores and reminiscence to their fullest potential. And as AI improvement continues to flourish, the kitted out configurations with 256GB or 512GB of reminiscence may show interesting to anybody fascinated with operating subtle LLM fashions domestically on their machine.
I’ve solely had our Mac Studio evaluation unit for a couple of days, so for now I’m offering the same old benchmarks and setting it up for a few of these LLM take a look at instances to gauge what it’s able to. Within the weeks forward, I’ll even be trying to pals and consultants in different fields that may totally respect the Studio’s capabilities to see what they consider its efficiency. When you’ve received concepts or checks you’d prefer to see us run by means of, be happy to share them within the feedback.
Images by Chris Welch / The Verge
Shot with the Nikon Z6III


